Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Wounded Veterans

Last night I watched this CNN feature To Iraq and Back and found it deeply troubling. I have never visited a military hospital (or served in the military), and seeing those young men a women, whose lives are destroyed, was heartbreaking.

I have long felt that the U.S. has an obligation to stay in Iraq to establish some order out of the mess it created, but this Woodruff story makes me want to just get everyone out immediately. The emotional shock of seeing healthy young people turned into vegetables by IED's leaves me unable to move on to my daily life.



However, I still support a phased draw down of U.S. troops beginning asap. That is the best way to avoid genocide and an unbridled fight amongst sectarian militias. I have to consider all people invoved, not just Americans. Further, Bush and Cheney have made practically every mistake possible with the Iraqi war, and I do not trust their judgement in deciding to have a troup surge (with only 21,500 more troups).

The Woodruff piece uncovered a major discrepancy between the number of wounded reported by the Dept. of Defense––26,000––and the number of wounded being treated by the VA–over 200,000!!! A couple of months ago, a poll came out, which documented the Iraqi wounded at over 650,000 people. The U.S. government says it's no where near that number (I think it estimated 90,000).

If the real number of American wounded is over 200,000, just think of how many Iraqis have been wounded. The Iraqi wounded are just incapacitated as the American wounded, plus they don't have as good medical care! (which isn't so good according to Woodruff and the recent news about Walter Reed Hospital).

Too everyone who complains about politicians and says they are all the same, just remember that if Gore had won (and he only "lost" Florida by 500 votes) we would not be in Iraq. I wonder how many dead or wounded American soldiers voted for Bush. That vote cost them their lives. They voted trusting the Commander and Chief to lead them wisely, and his abysmal failure to do so has lead to over 30,000 dead (Americans and Iraqi's) and close to 1,000,000 people wounded. I agree with Harry Reed, "This is the worst foreign policy mistake in U.S. history."

Who you vote for does matter.




I just heard an interview with Bob and Lee Woodruff on Fresh Air with Terry Gross. What amazing people.


Monday, February 26, 2007

Renewable Energy Bill currently in NC Legislature

North Carolinians will be interested in the Renewable Portfolio Standard, which the NC General Assembly and Senate are considering. If passed, this bill will reduce NC energy consumption by 10% and require 10% of NC’s energy come from renewable sources by 2010.

Charting North Carolina’s Clean Energy Future (pdf) outlines a number of very easy steps the NC senate and legislature can make our state into “the southeastern leader in promoting energy conservation, efficiency and the use of renewable technologies.”

Environment NC is pushing for a nationwide standard requiring 20% of the nation’s electricity to come from clean sources by 2020.

If you are not in the habit of communicating with your representatives, please take a few minutes to encourage them to support the RPS bill (House Bill 77 and Senate Bill 3). Email your representative, today. Yes, your email in support of this bill will be read and noted.


How to Shower

I though you all would find this funny...



Oscars and Poor Judgement

One of my astute friends made an interesting comment about Jennifer Hudson, who won best-supporting actress for Dream Girls last night.

She said, "Everyone has made Jennifer Hudson out to be a storybook character, who has gone from being anonymous to winning an Oscar in four years."

"But people forget that while she sang well on American Idol, she was snobish and carried a haughty attitude. That is partly why she was voted off."

This made me see, in a new light, the power of the media to twist a person's image. I am accustomed to seeing various pundits and marketing operatives twist political stories and other news, but I just realized that we only know entertainment figures through the media. With politicians, we know they are real people who are controlling their image to get re-elected to influence constituencies on an issue. We know stars control their image for marketing purposes. But here is an example of the media (and the Oscars) turning Hudson into something that benefits its own need. The need to create a story.

With Hudson, we all gained first-hand experience of her each week on American Idol. We are not so lucky as to gain a first-hand and live experience of politicians and other celebrities. Obama, more than Sen. Clinton and Sen. Edwards, comes accross as genuine and unrehearsed. His articulate speaking style conveys a natural polish rather than over rehearsed sound-bites.

I find that once I have my own impression (of the O.J. verdict, a State of the Union Speech, or a football player's performance for example), it takes conscious effort to maintain that perspective amidst the waves of media coverage giving alternate perspectives.

Perhaps writing here will help solidify my perceptions of first-hand experience–whether in politics, entertainment, or my own life.



p.s. (In spite of this, I have never been swayed, even for a second, by the White House's ardent assertions that things are going well in Iraq. It's almost as if they are seeing how long they can call the American people dumb before they get mad. We got mad and voted the Republicans out of office, but Cheney continues to act like he is our only source of news. How in the world can someone call the British deployment from Iraq a sign of progress? The Brits have forced Tony Blair's Labor Party to reduce troop levels. Do we have the only Democracy where the leader ignores the will of the people?)

Just found this related article, which documents Cheney's poor judgement:
Cheney's New Front in War on Reality


Sunday, February 25, 2007

Why Vegetarianism?

Last night I watched The Power of Myth on VHS. Bill Moyer’s interview of Joseph Campbell about storytelling gave me new insight into my reasons for living as a vegetarian.

Living as a Vegetarian

I for over ten years, I have identified with this simple maxim: Since I do not need to kill animals to live, then I should not kill them. I lived as a vegan for most of those years, and have only begun eating eggs in the past two years. This change came after kidney failure as I adjusted some basic habit to give myself more rest and more vitality. I now recognize there are benefits to eating animal proteins.

By living as a vegetarian, I raise awareness about food issues, and do not support the agro-business juggernauts, which defile nature to make a profit. At restaurants or in social situations, I am neither militant nor condescending towards meat eaters (or the host), but I stick to my principles. Sometimes people ask my why I am vegetarian, and this opens the door for a civil but direct conversation about the concomitant damage of eating meat. People make up their own minds about their diet, but at least know that making a few different choices can have profound impact.

In primary cultures, killing and eating an animal is a sacred event––not the mundane consumption of a commodity. I can understand sacrificing a cow for the village to eat on a special occasion. It provides the community with the sustenance necessary to remain healthy. But treating cattle as products for profit and a means to feeding Americans’ self-righteous appetite for meat at every meal is indefensible. Having a cow or goat on the farm to make milk products is far different than raising the animals in stalls, cutting their horns, and pumping them with hormones to increase milk production. The slaughter process is even more sickening. The animals are killed in fear––often not quickly––and with no respect. Fear produces adrenaline, and I do not want to eat fear.

Joseph Campbell
In the video last night, Campbell said that hunters undergo rituals to alleviate their guilt for killing the animal. Through ritual the hunters or communities ask forgiveness to show respect for the animal’s spirit. Through ritual, they also may entertain or appease the animal’s community to fulfill a requirement for it to come back and allow itself to be hunted again.

While I have long felt buying industrial meat at the grocery store disrespects animals, I now realize I have been missing a ritual to address my guilt. I avoid guilt by not eating the animal. But if I were stranded or in a different environment (one without an abundance of food and alternative protein choices) I would hunt to eat. As my culture did not provide me rituals for hunting, I would create my own ceremony to thank the animal and honor the animal as a sacred gift. Prayers before dinner are not adequate. They typically thank God for the food rather than address the animal. As Campbel says, ancient civilizations (such as the ones that created the cave paintings) honored the animals because they had something humans needed. Eating meat just doesn’t feel right to me without some sort of ritual at the time of death.

Ritual vs. Slaughter
Ritual is what distinguished the hunt from a slaughter. For me, the best-case scenario is to hunt or fish for a small group’s protein needs, and to perform rituals to recognize the killing of another life form. Eating meat twice a week is sufficient for health and encourages respect for the natural world. In this regard, I identify with hunters who kill overpopulated deer and freeze the meat or give it as gifts. I hope these types of hunters make use of the non-edible parts of the animal. At the same time, it is cowardly to kill for enjoyment. Equally despicable are the hunters who feed deer at designated locations and times only to hunker down in a shelter with a high-powered rifle and wait until feeding time.

Responsible Meat-eating
Every American can eat less meat and support local farmers over agro-businesses. Most Americans can eat organic food and buy fowl, beef, or pork from humane farmers who make an honest living while treating animals with respect.

Do not be fooled by free-range labels at the store. Most free-range farms meet minimum requirements for that label (which are pathetically low). Call the farm and ask the farmer where he gets his chicks from, if he feeds them organic food, and how much room the animals have to roam.

Join a local CSA, buy organic food from local farms or health food stores, and start a small garden. What would happen if 150 million out of America’s 300 million people grew half of their produce, ate meat three times a week, and drank soymilk? A revolution, that’s what. People would reconnect with their food sources. We would use land more ecologically. And agro-business would have less influence in Washington. If representatives represented small farmers rather than agricultural industry, we just might expose the lie that ethanol is the savior to our energy problems.

By eating more responsibly, Americans would have healthier, happier people, and freer citizens.